You are invited to join us for Global Crisis Watch 315, on Friday, February 14th at 10:00 GMT.
The highlighted topics will include:
Trump Pushes Ukraine Peace Talks; Kremlin Dismisses Land Trade
US President Donald Trump announced that negotiations to end the Ukraine war will begin “immediately” following a “lengthy and highly productive” phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. This marks the first known conversation between the two leaders since Trump assumed office last month.
Trump stated that they discussed Ukraine, the Middle East, energy, artificial intelligence and the power of the US dollar. Both Washington and Moscow emphasized a conciliatory tone, with Trump claiming Putin even echoed his campaign motto, “COMMON SENSE.” Trump also confirmed plans to contact Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to inform him of the discussion and begin the negotiation process.
This diplomatic realignment reflects Trump’s changing global policy priorities. His administration has suggested a lowered priority on European and Ukrainian security, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling Ukraine’s NATO membership “unrealistic.” Trump has also suggested striking a deal where Ukraine provides access to its rare earth minerals as payment for continued US assistance.
Meanwhile, Zelensky proposed a territorial exchange with Russia, offering to trade parts of Russia’s Kursk region that Ukraine currently holds in return for occupied Ukrainian land. However, the Kremlin firmly rejected the idea, with spokesman Dmitry Peskov stating that “Russia has never discussed and will not discuss” swapping territory.
As Russian forces continue to gain ground in Ukraine, Trump’s outreach to Putin could signal a new phase in the war. Whether these talks lead to a resolution or further political maneuvering remains uncertain.
No More US Guarantees: Trump Admin Signals Major Shift in Ukraine Policy
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ruled out Ukraine’s NATO membership and signaled a significant shift in US foreign policy, placing responsibility for Ukraine’s security on Europe. Speaking at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, Hegseth stated that NATO membership for Ukraine is “not a realistic outcome” and that European troops—not US forces—should guarantee Ukraine’s security in a post-war settlement. He also dismissed Ukraine’s goal of reclaiming its pre-2014 borders as “unrealistic.”
Hegseth’s remarks reflect a broader strategy under President Donald Trump, who emphasized that the US would no longer prioritize European and Ukrainian security, shifting focus to deterring war with China.
No new US aid for Ukraine was announced, reinforcing concerns among NATO allies about Washington’s commitment. While European leaders acknowledged the need for greater defense spending, concerns remain, especially among Eastern European NATO members. Hegseth reiterated Trump’s demand that allies increase defense spending to 5% of GDP.
While the US remains in NATO, the administration’s stance represents a radical change from Biden-era policies, increasing pressure on European allies to take the lead in supporting Ukraine. The shift raises questions about the future of US involvement in European security and its impact on the ongoing conflict.
Trump’s Gaza Proposal Faces Strong Arab Resistance, Egypt Offers Alternative
Egypt is working on a “comprehensive vision” for Gaza’s reconstruction that ensures Palestinians can remain in their homeland, rejecting US President Donald Trump’s proposal to forcibly relocate Gaza’s two million residents to Jordan, Egypt and other countries. The plan, which Trump discussed with Jordan’s King Abdullah, has been met with strong opposition from Arab states. King Abdullah reaffirmed Jordan’s stance against displacement, emphasizing the unified position of the Arab world. Trump’s controversial plan suggests that the US could take control of Gaza, displacing its population permanently.
The United Nations has warned that forced displacement would be illegal under international law and constitute ethnic cleansing. Egypt has pledged to work with the Trump administration towards a fair settlement for Palestinians but insists that any solution must respect their right to remain in Gaza. President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi also reinforced this message in recent discussions, emphasizing that reconstruction must occur without displacing the Palestinian population.
Arab leaders, including those from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE, are meeting to devise a counterproposal to Trump’s plan, which they view as harmful to regional stability. The focus is on a two-state solution, ensuring that the rights of Palestinians are upheld. These developments come amid ongoing tensions, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu supporting Trump’s vision while Hamas rejects it, further complicating the path to peace.
US and UK Refuse to Sign Global AI Declaration at Paris Summit
US Vice President JD Vance recently warned European leaders that excessive regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) could stifle innovation and potentially harm the technology’s transformative potential. Speaking at the French-hosted AI summit in Paris, Vance emphasized that the United States intends to maintain its leadership in AI development and rejected the European Union’s rigorous regulatory approach. He criticized the EU’s Digital Services Act and GDPR, arguing they impose excessive compliance costs on smaller firms, and warned that AI could be used for “authoritarian censorship” if heavily moderated.
This stance marked a clear contrast with European leaders, particularly French President Emmanuel Macron, who defended the need for regulation. Macron argued that AI regulations are necessary to build public trust and ensure the technology is safe and ethical. Macron’s remarks also puts Europe at odds with the UK, which, alongside the US, chose not to sign the final statement of the summit. The statement, which was signed by 60 countries including China, advocates for an inclusive, ethical and safe approach to AI development.
The ongoing divergence on AI governance highlights a broader geopolitical competition, with the US prioritizing market-driven policies and rapid innovation, while Europe pushes for comprehensive safeguards and ethical guidelines. This split raises questions about how countries will balance the economic opportunities of AI with its potential risks, particularly in an era of heightened global trade and technological rivalry.
Plus, all the stories that are catching our attention wherever we live in the world. Feel free to join us and add your voice to the conversation.